Table 2.
Abusive supervision measures against Hinkin’s (1998) scale development criteria
Steps of scale development | Tepper’s (2000) scale | Mitchell and Ambrose’s (2007) scale |
---|---|---|
1. Item generation | ||
(a) Content validity assessment | Yes | Not reported. It might be so because the scale was developed from Tepper’s (2000) scale, and Tepper’s (2000) scale has content validity |
(b) Number of items | 15 | 5 |
(c) Item scaling | 5-point Likert scale | 7-point Likert scale |
2. Questionnaire administration | ||
(a) Original sample | 741 workers |
Sample-I: 741 workers Sample-II: 338 workers |
3. Initial item reduction | ||
(a) Exploratory Factor Analysis | Not reported | Yes |
(b) Cronbach’s α | 0.90 | 0.89 |
4. Confirmatory factor analysis | Yes | Yes |
5. Convergent validity | Not reported | Not reported |
6. Discriminant validity | Yes | Yes |
7. Replication | U.S.A., Canada, China, Israel, South Korea, Belgium, India, Philippines, Portugal, Australia, Netherlands, and many others | U.S.A., China, India, Philippines, Finland, South Korea, Taiwan, U.A.E., Sweden |