Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 9;37(2):273–284. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4467

Table 3.

Sclerostin Versus Clinical Risk Factors (ALSPAC/LURIC)

LURIC (N = 2054) ALSPAC (N = 3015)
Exposure Outcome Model β (95% CI) p β (95% CI) p
Sclerostin eGFR 1 −0.36 (−0.40, –0.31) <0.001 −0.17 (−0.21, –0.14) <0.001
Sclerostin eGFR 2 −0.29 (−0.33, –0.25) <0.001 −0.11 (−0.15, –0.08) <0.001
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Sclerostin Diabetes 1 1.39 (1.24, 1.55) <0.001 1.31 (1.03, 1.68) 0.030
Sclerostin Diabetes 2 1.23 (1.10, 1.36) <0.001 1.37 (1.06, 1.78) 0.018
Sclerostin High glucose 1 1.20 (1.08, 1.33) <0.001 1.14 (0.90, 1.44) 0.272
Sclerostin High glucose 2 1.15 (1.04, 1.27) 0.009 1.14 (0.89, 1.46) 0.286
Sclerostin Hypertension 1 1.23 (1.09, 1.40) 0.001 1.24 (1.07, 1.43) 0.005
Sclerostin Hypertension 2 1.04 (0.93, 1.17) 0.459 1.19 (1.02, 1.39) 0.030

LURIC = Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health; ALSPAC = Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children; CI = confidence interval; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; OR = odds ratio.

Table shows results of linear/logistic regression analysis. Results are SD change in outcome/odds of outcome per SD increase in sclerostin, 95% CI, and p value. High glucose based on fasting plasma glucose concentration ≥7.0 mmol/L (whole blood ≥6.1 mmol/L). Model 1: unadjusted; model 2: adjusted for age and ethnic group (ALSPAC) and sex (LURIC), body mass index, smoking, and social deprivation.