Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 1;28:1610521. doi: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610521

TABLE 2.

Results of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry.

Case no Diagnosis Epidermis Dermis
KC PD-L1 (%) CD3 (count/field) CD4 (count/field) CD8 (count/field) GB (count/field) GB/CD8 ratio PD-1 (count/field) PD-1/CD3 ratio PD-L1 (count/field) CD123 CD163
1 DI-SCLE 40 360 160 120 25 0.21 12 0.03 65 2+ 2+
2 DI-SCLE 50 80 18 66 13 0.20 8 0.10 68 1+ 3+
3 I-SCLE 80 280 102 230 54 0.23 48 0.17 105 2+ 1+
4 I-SCLE 80 145 20 78 41 0.53 12 0.08 28 3+ 2+
SCLE group median 65 212.5 61 99 33 0.22 12 0.09 66.5
5 DLE 5 260 190 78 48 0.62 55 0.21 38 1+ 2+
6 DLE 5 400 235 140 68 0.49 21 0.05 90 3+ 2+
7 DLE 5 110 10 90 35 0.39 20 0.18 22 2+ 1+
8 DLE 30 230 40 180 79 0.44 40 0.17 90 3+ 2+
DLE group median 5 245 115 115 58 0.46 30.5 0.18 64
9 TEN-like lupus (early) 30 138 18 87 22 0.24 45 0.12 68 3+
10 TEN-like lupus (late) 70 108 26 90 43 0.49 27 0.20 13 3+

KC PD-L1 stainings were evaluated in the whole sample and were considered positive if there was moderate to high intensity staining in >1% of the cells (SCLE, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; DI-SCLE, PD-1 inhibitor-induced SCLE; DLE, discoid lupus erythematosus; TEN, toxic epidermal necrolysis; KC, keratinocyte; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1).