Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug;378:None. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2022.104572

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Evaluation of homing and exhaustion markers expressed on monofunctional and polyfunctional MAIT cells over a 28-day post-challenge follow-up period.Ex vivo PBMC from participants receiving the S. Typhi inoculum were stained, and mono and polyfunctional MAIT cells gated as described in Fig. 3. The curves represent the mean of the net responses, and the bands denote the standard errors of these responses in NoTF (○) and TF (●) participants. Net responses were calculated by subtracting the MAIT cell responses of the controls (uninfected B-LCLs) from those to B-LCLs infected with S. Typhi. Only MAIT cell functional signatures suggestive of having an impact on disease outcome based on PCA analysis (Fig. 6 and text) were used to evaluate the concomitant expression of homing (i.e., CCR6 & CCR9) and exhaustion (i.e., CD57) markers. FCOM analysis was employed to study the 7 possible combinations of CCR6 & CCR9 and CD57 expression on MAIT cells. The dashed lines represent the baseline values (day 0). Numbers in the “X” axis represent days after challenge, except for the numbers inside of the green box that represent 48 and 96 hrs after diagnosis of typhoid disease. *, represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between the NoTF (○) and TF (●) at the same timepoint. The data represent absolute MAIT cell numbers per microliter of peripheral blood.