Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 28;6(7):e33562. doi: 10.2196/33562

Table 4.

Health utilities evaluation of race-matched vs race-mismatched video patient cohort.

Health utilities Overall, mean (SD) Race-matched videos, mean (SD) Race-mismatched videos, mean (SD) P valuea
Visual analog scale

Hemodialysis 57.9 (25.9) 63.2 (26.7) 52.0 (25.3) .11

Kidney transplant 88.2 (17.8) 85.2 (22.3) 91.5 (10.2) .68

Hepatitis C–viremic kidney transplantb 66.30 (27.3) 65.6 (27.4) 67.1 (27.7) .94
Standard gamble

Hemodialysis 82.5 (23.1) 85.3 (20.5) 79.4 (25.6) .26

Kidney transplant 89.0 (18.0) 87.4 (19.4) 90.7 (15.8) .67

Hepatitis C–viremic kidney transplantb 75.5 (28.2) 75.5 (29.7) 75.5 (26.9) .68
Time trade-off

Hemodialysis 80.3 (20.5) 78.2 (21.0) 82.6 (20.0) .39

Kidney transplant 84.8 (22.0) 85.4 (22.6) 84.2 (21.7) .74

Hepatitis C-viremic kidney transplantb 73.8 (28.1) 75.1 (27.0) 72.3 (29.6) .76

aP value denotes comparison between race-matched and race-mismatch population health utilities. This assumes that if P≤.05, there was a significant difference in health utilities between race-matched (same race) and race-mismatched (different race) health utilities.

bHealth utility normalization equation: Raw hepatitis C virus utility * Kidney transplant utility = hepatitis C virus utility.