Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb;53(1):113–138. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01419-y

Table 3.

Counts of frames given human analysts’ classifications (rows) and LENA classifications (columns). Percentages are given reflecting the number of frames assigned one or more specific labels by LENA, divided by the total number of frames within that human classification category. Percentage values across rows thus sum to 100% (with any deviations due to rounding).

LENA Classifications

FAN MAN CHN or CXN NON OLN TVN FUZ SIL or “faint” Totals
Human classifications female adult speech 46011 (59%) 3951 (5%) 9068 (12%) 249 (0%) 5954 (8%) 1264 (2%) 574 (7%) 5126 (7%) 77370
male adult speech 6770 (18%) 21790 (57%) 1482 (4%) 46 (0%) 2151 (6%) 895 (2%) 2768 (7%) 2182 (6%) 38084
child vocalization 4561 (7%) 399 (1%) 41908 (63%) 355 (1%) 7481 (11%) 565 (1%) 3878 (6%) 7011 (11%) 66158
other 11400 (4%) 8855 (3%) 27715 (11%) 2603 (1%) 18781 (7%) 6777 (3%) 40284 (16%) 14277 5 (55%) 25919 0

Totals 68742 34995 80173 3253 34367 9501 52677 15709 4 44080 2

Note. Counts in boldface font were considered correct classifications.