Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 6;28(4):629–636. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2272

Table 3.

Tumor response, PFS, and OS according to immune subtypes.

Ayers IFNγ signature Ayers expanded IFNγ signature Thorsson six-class immune signature
Outcome (groups 2 and 3 vs. group 1) High Low High Low Class 2 Not class 2
ORR, % 56.5 vs. 38.5 36.7 vs. 22.2 50.0 vs. 38.5 41.4 vs. 22.2 48.6 vs. 30.0 38.9 vs. 33.3
Median PFS, months 11.3 vs. 5.7 8.8 vs. 8.3 9.7 vs. 5.7 9.4 vs. 8.3 10.9 vs. 9.2 9.4 vs. 5.4
 HR (95% CI) 0.49 (0.2–1.11) 0.87 (0.3–2.2) 0.47 (0.2–1.1) 1.1 (0.4–2.7) 0.69 (0.3–1.7) 0.76 (0.3–1.8)
Median OS, months 22.3 vs. 12.8 15.6 vs. 8.3 20.1 vs. 12.8 15.6 vs. 9.1 32.7 vs. 12.8 13.1 vs. 10.2
 HR (95% CI) 0.40 (0.2–0.9) 0.37 (0.2–0.9) 0.41 (0.2–0.9) 0.40 (0.2–0.9) 0.46 (0.2–1.0) 0.49 (0.2–1.0)

Note: Group 1, chemotherapy on days 1 and 8; group 2, trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy on days 1 and 8; group 3, trilaciclib alone on days 1 and 8 and prior to chemotherapy on days 2 and 9. HRs are for comparisons between groups 2 and 3 combined and group 1. Class 2 was defined as IFNγ-dominant. Not adjusted for multiplicity.