Table 4.
Research Priorities | Stakeholder Grouping |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
ED Providers | Non-ED Providers | PLWD/Care Partners | All Stakeholders | |
| ||||
What improves outcomes of ED-to-community care transitions among ED patients with impaired cognition and their care partners (eg, system, program operations, individual/care-partner strengths/needs) and how can these be personalized for vulnerable pops? | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
What matters most to ED patients with impaired cognition and their care partners during the ED-to-community transition and how can these priorities best be measured? | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
What barriers, facilitators, and strategies, specifically leveraging implementation science methods, influence engagement, uptake, and success of care transition interventions, including national guidelines, policies, and best practices? | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
How can care partners and community organizations be best engaged and empowered to improve ED-to-community care transitions? | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
How can communication quality surrounding ED-to-community transitions be optimally measured? | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
N = 61. ED providers n = 25. Non-ED providers n = 29. PLWD/care partners n = 7.