Table 3.
Results of the hierarchical multiple regression analysis with personal initiative at T2 as dependent variable (Study 1).
| Variable | Personal initiative T2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | β | B | SE | β | |
| Control variables | ||||||
| Age T1 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Gender T1 | −0.11 | 0.09 | −0.08 | −0.06 | 0.09 | −0.04 |
| Main effects | ||||||
| EOE T1 | −0.01 | 0.07 | −0.01 | |||
| LST T1 | −0.04 | 0.05 | −0.06 | |||
| AES T1 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.28** | |||
| R 2 | 0.009 | 0.087 | ||||
N = 215. T1 = time 1, T2 = time 2. EOE, ease of excitation; LST, low sensory threshold; and AES, aesthetic sensitivity. R2 = proportion of variance explained in the criterion.
**
p < 0.01.