Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;68(2):77–83. [Article in French] doi: 10.1111/idj.12330

Table 1.

Subpopulation characteristics of those who received third molar extraction

Population size Unweighted count (n = 120) Estimate N% (SE)/95% CI
Estimate SE
Age group
18–25 years 277,359.3 46,194.5 63.0 (5.4)
≥26 years 162,667.3 25,271.8 37.0 (5.4)
Gender
Male 193,656.3 33,314.8 44.0 (6.0)
Female 246,370.3 40,351.3 56.0 (6.0)
Had a tertiary qualification
No 114,747.5 27,024.5 26.1 (5.4)
Yes 325,279.0 44,372.9 73.9 (5.4)
Household income
<$60,000 153,921.7 31,122.5 41.7 (6.4)
≥$60,000 215,321.4 33,631.4 58.3 (6.4)
Whether have private dental insurance
Yes 203,138.7 35,145.6 47.4 (6.2)
No 225,593.5 38,329.0 52.6 (6.2)
Single or multiple third molar extraction
Single third molar extraction 170,993.3 29,231.7 39.1 (5.8)
Multiple third molar extraction 265,811.4 43,244.1 60.9 (5.8)
Self-rated oral health
Poor 23,299.6 11,611.3 5.3 (2.6)
Fair 51,650.8 20,624.7 11.7 (4.4)
Good 111,623.2 28,988.1 25.4 (5.6)
Very good 198,538.3 33,979.6 45.1 (6.1)
Excellent 54,914.7 16,060.2 12.5 (3.5)
Total 440,026.6 53,722.7 100.0 (0.0)
Mean number of days absent 2.1 0.4 1.3–2.9

Estimate (standard error), in %, or 95% confidence interval.