Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 16;70(Suppl 1):S7–S15. doi: 10.1111/idj.12571

Table 4.

Results for molar gingivitis efficacy endpoints

Baseline (SD)* Adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline Ratio vs. manual brush 2-Sided P-value
MGI
Week 1
Manual brush 2.251 (0.150) 0.002 (0.016) 0.048
Novel O-R electric brush 2.242 (0.179) 0.047 (0.016) 23.50
Week 8
Manual brush 2.251 (0.150) 0.072 (0.013) <0.001
Novel O-R brush 2.242 (0.179) 0.223 (0.024) 3.10
GBI
Week 1
Manual brush 0.358 (0.182) 0.002 (0.004) 0.001
Novel O-R electric brush 0.355 (0.181) 0.023 (0.005) 11.50
Week 8
Manual Brush 0.358 (0.182) 0.029 (0.006) <0.001
Novel O-R electric brush 0.355 (0.181) 0.189 (0.012) 6.52
Number of bleeding sites
Week 1
Manual brush 13.273 (6.193) 0.121 (0.141) 0.002
Novel O-R electric brush 12.018 (4.844) 0.732 (0.130) 6.05
Week 8
Manual brush 13.273 (6.193) 1.008 (0.243) <0.001
Novel O-R electric brush 12.018 (4.844) 6.133 (0.423) 6.08
*

Baseline gingivitis measures in the molar region did not differ significantly (P ≥ 0.239) between treatment groups.

Reductions versus baseline were statistically significant in all regions only at week 8 for the manual brush (P < 0.001) and at both weeks 1 (P < 0.014) and 8 (P < 0.001) for the electric brush.

Ratio = novel electric brush group/manual brush.