Table 3.
Results of the proportional odds model analysis for the evaluation of the distribution of the STO score among four MR scanners.
Analysis of deviance table (Type II test) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Variable | χ2 | df | p -value |
MRI scanner | 1.3 | 3 | 0.73 |
Brant test table for the proportional odds model | |||
Variable tested for | χ2 | df | p -value a |
Aera | 0.18 | 2 | 0.91 |
Avanto | 2.3 | 2 | 0.32 |
Skyra | 0.19 | 2 | 0.91 |
TrioTim | 10 | 6 | 0.11 |
aIf there are no significant p-values, the model satisfies the proportional odds assumption.