Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 16;69:103100. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103100

Table 10.

Multigroup analysis results.

Comparison Country Path Coefficient P-value
Can vs USA PU - > CNT −0.148 0.019
Can vs Germany PU - > HED −0.108 0.026
USA vs Germany HED - > CNT −0.138 0.024
PU - > CNT 0.167 0.01


PU - > HED
−0.17
0.001
Male vs Female
All
HED - > CNT
−0.113
0.028
Male vs Female Canada n.s. n.s. n.s.
USA n.s. n.s. n.s.

Germany
n.s.
n.s.
n.s.
Age1 vs Age4 All HED - > CNT 0.176 0.019


PU - > CNT
−0.18
0.011
Age1 vs Age4 Canada n.s. n.s. n.s.
USA n.s. n.s. n.s.

Germany
CNV - > PU
0.306
0.027
OSL1 vs OLS3
All



OLS1 vs OSL3 Canada CNV - > PU −0.377 0.013
USA n.s. n.s. n.s.
Germany HED - > CNT 0.255 0.044
PU - > CNT −0.338 0.014

Note: PU=Perceived Usefulness; CNT=Continuance Intention; HED=Hedonic Motivation; CNV=Perceived Convenience; Age1 = 19 to 26 (Gen Z); Age4 = 57+ (Other); OLS1 = Never or less than once per month (Very little); OLS3 = 5 times or more per month (Experienced); n.s. = not significant.