Table 6.
Hypothesis support and R2 for gender by country.
| Canada |
USA |
Germany |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | M | F | M | F | |
| H1: FUL-PU | ||||||
| H2: SEC-PU | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| H3: EFF-PU | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| H4: PRI-PU | ||||||
| H5: CNV-PU | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| H6: PU-CNT | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| H7: PU-SUS | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| H7: SUS-CNT | ||||||
| H9: PU-HED | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| H9: HED-CNT | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| R2 | 0.464 | 0.575 | 0.519 | 0.487 | 0.501 | 0.542 |
Note: FUL=Fulfillment; PU=Perceived Usefulness; SEC=Perceived Security; EFF = Perceived Efficiency; PRI=Perceived Privacy Concerns; CNV=Perceived Convenience; CNT=Continuance Intention; SUS=Perceived Health Susceptibility; HED=Hedonic Motivation.