Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 9;5:e8. doi: 10.1017/pen.2021.5

Table 3.

Characteristics of gray matter volume meta-analysis studies with extraversion (18 studies)

Study Sample size (F/M) Mean Age (Range) Personality Instrument Image Process (Software) Covariate Threshold (Correction) Results (t range)
Andari et al., 2014 30 (13/17) 23.6 (18–37) NEO-PI-R VBM (SPM2) Age, sex, TGMV 0.05 (cluster, NSTA) (t 3.36–6.17)
Pos. NSig
Neg. l MTG, r ITG, r PCN, r LNG, r PHC, r HIP
Coutinho et al., 2013 52 (29/23) 25.0 (19–52) NEO-FFI VBM (SPM8) Age, gender, ICV 0.05 (cluster, MCS) (t 4.02–4.41)
Pos. NSig
Neg. l/r MFG, l/r midOFC, r IFG, r SFG
Cremers et al., 2011 65 (42/23) 40.5 (21–56) NEO-FFI VBM (SPM5) Age, TGMV, alternative trait (N), scan lefts 0.05 (voxel, FWE) 0.001 (Uncor, k > 25) (t 3.49–4.50) Cor: NSig Uncor:
Pos. l/r medOFC, l PCG, l CRB, r AMY, r SPL
Neg.
DeYoung et al., 2010 116 (58/58) 22.9 (18–40) NEO-PI-R VBM (BIS) Age, sex, TBV, other four traits 0.05 (cluster, MCS) (study without segmentation) (t NS)
Pos. r medOFC
Neg. Nsig
Forsman et al., 2012 32 (0/32) 33.2 (19–49) 16PF (version 5) VBM (SPM2) Age 0.05 (voxel, FDR) (t 3.66–5.82)
Pos. NSig
Neg. l/r SFG, l VLPFC, l/r SMG, l IPS, l IOG, l THA, r MFG, r SFS, r IFG, r ANG, r MTG/ITG, r CAD
Hu et al., 2011 62 (31/31) 26.6 (20–40) NEO-FFI VBM (SPM5) Age, gender, TGMV 0.05 (voxel, FWE) NSig
Kapogiannis et al., 2013 87 (42/45) 72.0 (59–85) NEO-PI-R VBM (SPM8) * This study performed a conjunction analysis between two time points 0.05 (cluster, FWE) (t 3.80–5.60)
Age (both time points), sex (both time points), ICV (Time 1), education (both time points), same trait (another time point), other four traits (both time points), time 1 and time 2 Pos. l STG, l ACG, l/r MFG, l SMA, l IOG, l SFG, r INS
Neg. l IOG, l SPL, r PHC
Koelsch et al., 2013 59 (34/25) 19.9 (18–27) NEO-FFI VBM (SPM8) age, gender, TBV 0.05 (voxel, FWE) NSig
Lewis et al., 2018 578 (268/310) 72.7 (NS) 50-IPIP SBM (CIVET 1.1.12) Age, sex, ICV, other four traits, intelligence 0.05 (vertex, FDR) NSig
T. Li et al., 2017 108 (64/44) 40.3 (19–60) NEO-FFI SBM (CCS) Age, sex, ICV 0.05 (voxel, FDR) NSig
Liu et al., 2013 227 (168/59) 25.8 (18–62) NEO-FFI VBM (SPM8) Age, sex, other four traits, scanner type 0.05 (cluster, FWE) NSig
Lu et al., 2014 71 (37/34) 22.4 (19–26) EPQ-RSC VBM (SPM8) Age, sex, ICV 0.05 (cluster, MCS) (t 3.22–5.11)
Pos. NSig
Neg. l/r AMY, l/r PHC, l SFG, r MTG
Omura et al., 2005 41 (22/19) 23.8 (NS) NEO-PI-R VBM (SPM2) Age, sex 0.001 (Uncor, k > 200) (GMC) (t 4.17–5.17)
Pos. l/r OFC, l FSF, l PHC, r CAL, r STG
Neg. l/r PRC
Owens et al., 2019 1104 (599/505) 28.8 (22–37) NEO-FFI SBM (FS 5.3) Age, sex, ICV, other four traits 0.05 (cluster, MCS) (t 3.38)
Pos. r PRC
Neg. NSig
Privado et al., 2017 56 (56/0) 18.3 (17–22) NEO-FFI SBM (CIVET 2.0) TGMV 0.01 (vertex, FWE) (t 3.92)
Pos. l MOG
Neg. NSig
Taki et al., 2013 274 (161/113) 51.2 (21–80) NEO-PI-R VBM (SPM8) Age, gender, ICV, other four traits 0.05 (voxel, FWE) NSig
Yasuno et al., 2017 37 (10/27) 28.1 (21–45) NEO-FFI VBM (SPM12) 0.05 (cluster, FWE) (T1w/T2w) NSig
Zou et al., 2018 100 (50/50) 21.9 (18–27) EPQ-RSC VBM (SPM8) Age, sex, head motion 0.05 (cluster, FWE) (t 4.05–4.06)
Pos. NSig
Neg. l/r PUT

Note. Threshold: The threshold denotes the threshold p value, correction level (voxel-/vertex- versus cluster-level), and correction method used in the study; Result t range: The range of the absolute t value for significant peaks reported by each study was presented in the Result column. If only one value was presented, it suggests only one significant peak from the study result. For studies with effect sizes as “NS (not specified),” meta-analysis was conducted with converting the threshold used in the study. Abbreviation used in the table can be found in Supplementary Table S20.