Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 12;24(8):971–983. doi: 10.1111/jch.14536

TABLE 3.

Treatment ranking probability of sitting SBP in the 12‐week group

Rank probability of sitting SBP in the 12‐week group
Ranking 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
AZL 0.362780 0.226455 0.108435 0.072845 0.047505 0.047505 0.041880 0.061740 0.020780
CAN 0.009890 0.038945 0.102570 0.156230 0.184460 0.188610 0.156995 0.156905 0.005395
FIM 0.076415 0.163330 0.288030 0.197060 0.133295 0.078960 0.042235 0.020060 0.000615
IBR 0.041930 0.097690 0.193975 0.203735 0.174860 0.126600 0.089695 0.069890 0.001625
LOS 0.000280 0.004115 0.022330 0.066245 0.138480 0.227075 0.289925 0.245150 0.006400
OLM 0.019345 0.075300 0.191445 0.235380 0.202205 0.138600 0.086815 0.048960 0.001950
TEL 0.489065 0.392545 0.081600 0.025630 0.008210 0.002360 0.000515 0.000070 0.000005
VAL 0.000095 0.001620 0.011610 0.042840 0.100930 0.189490 0.287730 0.357950 0.007735
PBO 0 0 0.000005 0.000035 0.000180 0.0008 0.004210 0.039275 0.955495

Preferred direction = ‐1, AZL, azilsartan; C, candesartan cilexetil; FIM, fimasartan; IBR, irbesartan; LOS, losartan; OLM, omlesartan; PBO, placebo; TEL, telmisartan; and VAL, valsartan. Ranking nearer 1 suggest greater efficacy and each value means the probability that interventions are selected as corresponding ranking.

Bold values indicate the highest rank probabilities in each week group.