Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;38(3):174–183. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_393_21

Table 4.

Perioperative outcomes in studies included in the review with high complexity renal masses (radius, endophytic/ exophytic, nearness, anterior/posterior location or preoperative aspects of dimension used for anatomic classification score ≥10)

Study, year (n) Duration (min), mean Blood loss (ml), mean Blood transfusion, n (%) WIT (min), mean Grade I or II complication, n (%) Grade III, IV complication, n (%) Hospital stay (days), mean Margin positivity, n (%)
Garisto, 2018 (203) 208 200 6 (2.9) 28 43 (21.1) 14 (6.9) 3 18/179 (10)
Hennessey, 2017 (31) 155 200 - 23 2 (6.4) 0 3.5 1 (3.2)
Kim, 2019 (85) 150 200 8 (9.4) 24 8 (9.4) 10 (11.7) 5 0
Raheem, 2016 (121) 164 360 10 (8.2) 26 20 (16.5) 6 (4.9) 5.6 12 (9.9)
Schiavina, 2016 (79) 169 243 - 24.7 2 (2.5) 4 (5) - -
Simhan, 2012 (10) 221 225 - 33.8 - - 3.7 0
Tomaszewski, 2014 (24) 215 262 - 36.1 - - - -
Ubrig, 2018 (212) 193.7 - 3 (1.4) 15.5 35 (16.5) 19 (8.9) - 13 (6.1)
Volpe, 2014 (44) 132.5 381 2 (4.5) 18 6 (13.6) 4 (9) 7.7 2 (4.5)
White, 2011 (11) 201 456.25 - 27 - - 4 1 (9)
Beksac, 2019 (144) 214.6 168.75 1 (0.69) 20.25 12 (8.3) 3 (2.3) 1 8 (5.5)
Buffi, 2019 (255) 162 162.5 - 18.5 62 (24.3) 13 (5.1) 4 4 (1.9)
n=1246 132.5-214.6 (range) 200-456.25 (range) 30/836 (3.5) (weighted mean) 15.5-36.1 (range) 190/1170 (16.2) (weighted mean) 73/1170 (6.2) (weighted mean) 1-7.7 (range) 59/1119 (5.2) (weighted mean)

WIT=Warm ischemia time