Table 2.
Association between NLR and diabetic retinopathy
| Variable | Crude Model | Model I | Model II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CIs) | P value | OR (95%CIs) | P value | OR (95%CIs) | P value | |
| NLR | 1.112 (1.054, 1.173) | 0.0001** | 1.098 (1.040, 1.159) | 0.0007** | 1.076 (1.015, 1.142) | 0.0146* |
| NLR (Tertiles) | ||||||
| < 1.76 | 1.0(ref) | 1.0(ref) | 1.0(ref) | |||
| ≥ 1.76, < 2.57 | 1.204 (0.962, 1.507) | 0.1047 | 1.162 (0.927, 1.457) | 0.1924 | 1.111 (0.862, 1.433) | 0.4164 |
| ≥ 2.57 | 1.520 (1.222, 1.891) | 0.0002** | 1.438 (1.152, 1.796) | 0.0013** | 1.371 (1.066, 1.765) | 0.0141* |
| P trend | 0.0002** | 0.0012** | 0.0116* | |||
OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence interval
Models were derived from logistic multivariate regression models
Crude model adjust for: none
Adjust I model adjust for: age, gender
Adjust II model adjust for: age, gender, BMI; poverty income ratio; diabetes duration; marital status; stroke; coronary heart disease; heart failure
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01