Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 17;22:679. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03374-z

Table 4.

Comparison of FI-self-report vs FI-lab vs FI-combined for Prediction of 5-year mortality

B SE Wald Statistic HR(95%CI)a AUC (95% CI)
FI-self-report 0.79b(0.77–0.82)
Age 0.08 0.01 53.88 1.09 (1.06–1.11)*
Female -0.56 0.17 11.35 0.57 (0.41–0.79)*
FI-self-report 0.04 0.01 44.22 1.04 (1.03–1.05)*
FI-lab 0.77c(0.75–0.80)
Age 0.11 0.01 107.21 1.12 (1.10–1.14)*
Female -0.34 0.16 4.35 0.72 (0.52–0.98)*
FI-lab 0.02 0.01 9.54 1.02 (1.01–1.03)*
FI-combined 0.81d(0.78–0.82)
Age 0.09 0.01 61.02 1.09 (1.07–1.12)*
Female -0.54 0.17 10.53 0.58 (0.42–0.81)*
FI-combined 0.05 0.01 46.23 1.05 (1.04–1.07)*
FI-self-report & FI-lab
Age 0.08 0.01 53.12 1.09 (1.06–1.11)*
Female -0.56 0.17 11.41 0.57 (0.41–0.79)*
FI-self-report 0.04 0.01 38.04 1.04 (1.03–1.05)*
FI-lab 0.01 0.01 4.86 1.02 (1.00–1.03)*

Abbreviations: FI Frailty index, AUC Area under the curve, CI Confidence interval, SE Standard error, HR Hazard ratio,*p<0.05 was considered  as significance

a Adjusted for age and sex

b p = .042 for comparison of FI-self-report vs FI-lab

c p = .028 for comparison of FI-lab vs FI-combined

d p = .049 for comparison of FI-self-report vs FI-combined