Table 2.
Exposure metric and buffer size | Primary window | Perinatal window | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cases () | Controls () | Cases () | Controls () | |
n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
Exposed | 14 (3) | 37 (2) | 7 (2) | 13 (1) |
Unexposed | 391 (97) | 2,043 (98) | 398 (98) | 2,067 (99) |
Exposed | 31 (8) | 122 (6) | 18 (4) | 61 (3) |
Unexposed | 374 (92) | 1,958 (94) | 387 (96) | 2,019 (97) |
Exposed | 59 (15) | 270 (13) | 41 (10) | 153 (7) |
Unexposed | 346 (85) | 1,810 (87) | 364 (89) | 1,927 (83) |
Exposed | 6 (2) | 16 (1) | 3 (1) | 5 (1) |
Unexposed | 399 (98) | 2,064 (99) | 402 (99) | 2,075 (99) |
Exposed | 12 (3) | 43 (2) | 6 (1) | 21 (1) |
Unexposed | 393 (97) | 2,037 (98) | 399 (99) | 2,059 (99) |
Exposed | 18 (5) | 74 (4) | 12 (3) | 39 (2) |
Unexposed | 346 (95) | 1,810 (96) | 393 (97) | 2,041 (98) |
Note: Exposure for each buffer size and metric was dichotomized due to low exposure prevalence. , inverse distance-squared weighted well count; , inverse distance to the nearest upgradient UOG well; UOG, unconventional oil and gas.