Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 22;480(9):1731–1742. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002215

Table 2.

Diagnostic validity of AP radiographs, WP radiographs, CT, and MRI compared with intraoperative findings (n = 50)

AP (95% CI) WP (95% CI) CT (95% CI) MRI (95% CI)
Sensitivity 0.44 (0.21-0.69) 0.67 (0.41-0.86) 0.89 (0.65-0.98) 0.94 (0.71-0.99)
Specificity 0.65 (0.46-0.81) 0.72 (0.53-0.86) 0.69 (0.50-0.83) 0.63 (0.45-0.80)
PPV 0.42 (0.26-0.59) 0.57 (0.41-0.71) 0.61 (0.48-0.73) 0.59 (0.47-0.70)
NPV 0.68 (0.56-0.77) 0.79 (0.65-0.88) 0.91 (0.74-0.97) 0.95 (0.74-0.99)
Accuracy 0.58 (0.43-0.72) 0.70 (0.55-0.82) 0.76 (0.61-0.86) 0.74 (0.60-0.86)
DOR 1.53 (0.46-4.97) 5.12 (1.46-17.78) 17.60 (3.38-91.56) 27.6 (3.21-237.83)
LR + 1.26 (0.64-2.61) 2.40 (1.25-4.51) 2.87 (1.66-4.88) 2.54 (1.63-4.33)
LR - 0.86 (0.52-1.37) 0.46 (0.23-0.92) 0.16 (0.04-0.61) 0.09 (0.01-0.62)
AUC 0.55 (0.39-0.72) 0.69 (0.54-0.85) 0.79 (0.66-0.92) 0.83 (0.70-0.94)
p value a 0.69 0.02 < 0.001 < 0.001
Cramer V 0.48 (p = 0.10) 0. 37 (p < 0.01) 0.55 (p < 0.01) 0.67 (p < 0.01)
a

The p values represent the comparison of each imaging modality (AP, WP, CT, and MRI) against the arthroscopic findings; the Cramer V test describes the strength of the correlation between the results of each diagnostic imaging against arthroscopic findings; WP = West Point; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value; DOR = diagnostic odds ratio; LR + = positive likelihood ratio; LR- = negative likelihood ratio; AUC = area under the curve.