Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 5;16(8):e0010207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010207

Table 1. Baseline characteristics by qPCR/ RLDT positivity.

Total samples tested n (%) Positive by RLDT n (%) p value Positive by qPCR n (%) p value
Age
 <12 months 159 (49.1) 26 (16.4) 0.41 26 (16.4) 0.44
 12–23 months 37 (11.4) 9 (24.3) 8 (21.6)
 24–59 months 98 (30.2) 21 (21.4) 22 (22.4)
 missing * 30 (9.3) 7 (23.3) 8 (26.7)
Sex 63 19.75
 Male 152 (46.9) 34 (22.4) 0.29 34 (22.4) 0.35
 Female 165 (50.9) 29 (17.6) 30 (18.2)
 missing * 7 (2.2) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Symptomatic
 No 92(28.4) 12(13) 0.07 13(14.1) 0.092
 Yes 227(70.1) 51(22.5) 51(22.5)
 missing * 5(1.5) 0(0) 0(0)
Severity
 Mild /Moderate 287 (88.6) 50 (17.4) 1.0 1 51 (17.8) 0.70 1
 Severe 10 (3.1) 1 (10) 2 (20)
 missing * 27 (8.3) 12 (44.4) 11 (40.7)
WASH
 Adequate 213 (65.7) 40 (18.8) 0.15 40 (18.8) 0.70
 Inadequate 62 (19.1) 11 (17.7) 13 (21)
 Missing * 49 (15.1) 12 (24.5) 11 (22.4)
Total 324 (100) 63 (19.4) 64 (19.8)

NOTE: Chi square test was used to compare the association of baseline characteristics such as age, sex, and Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) data against RLDT and qPCR ETEC positivity.

1 Fishers exact test was used to compare diarrhea severity to the association of the RLDT and qPCR ETEC positivity.

missing* category was not included in the statistical tests; analysis was performed on complete data. P values less than 0.05 show a statistically significant difference.