TABLE III.
Author | Disease Site | Image Type, Number of cases | Algorithm | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Zhu et al.[1] | Head and Neck | Planning CT, 261 | 3D U-Net, whole image | -9 OAR contours generated in ~0.12 seconds -Increased DSC ~3% |
Lei et al.[2] | Male Pelvis | Cone-beam with synthetic MRI, 100 | CycleGAN | -DSC >0.9 and MDA <1.0 mm for bladder, prostate, rectum from ground truth delineations |
Dong et al.[3] | Thorax | CT, 35 | U-Net GAN | -DSC>0.87 and MDA <1.5 mm for lungs, cord, heart -DSC esophagus ~0.75 -Negligible dosimetric differences |
van der Heyden et al.[4] | Brain | Dual-energy CT, 14 | 2-step 3D U-Net | -Quantitatively and qualitatively outperformed atlas method for all organs at risk but optic nerves |
Chen et al.[6] | Abdomen | 3T MRI, 102 | 2D U-Net | -9/10 OARs had DSC 0.87-0.96 -Duodenum DSC ~0.8 |
Fu et al.[7] | Abdomen | 0.35 T, MR-linac, 120 | CNN with correction method | -4/5 OARs had DSC >0.85 (liver, kidneys, stomach, bowel) -Duodenum DSC ~0.65 |