Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 16;16(4):044107. doi: 10.1063/5.0096684

TABLE I.

The conventional protocol was performed on three disodium EDTA and sodium heparin anticoagulated human whole blood. Using a t-test assuming unequal variance, the results of average concentration, average RIN, and average Cq value for three samples were compared between disodium EDTA and sodium heparin anticoagulants. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between any of the aforementioned values between the two anticoagulants. The volume of the reagents in the conventional protocol was scaled down by a factor of 22, and a separate experiment mixed the two wash buffers 1:1 to reduce the number of wash steps. Using the conventional protocol as a reference group, all measured values of the adjusted protocols were compared to that of the reference group and were not statistically significant. Note: For the “1/22 scale down” concentration values in the elution buffer—This is not the actual yield of the 1/22 scale down protocol, but for comparison purposes, the measured value was multiplied by 22.

Anticoagulant Protocol Average RNA yield (ng/μl elution buffer) ± standard deviation Average actual yield (ng/μl blood) Expected yield (ng/μl blood) Average RIN ± standard deviation Average Cq value ± standard deviation
Disodium EDTA Conventional protocol 25 ± 7.21 2.5 4.3 ± 3.0 30.06 ± 4.43
1/22 scale down 54.05 ± 24.42 0.54 3.4 ± 0.5 29.60 ± 0.85
1:1 Wash buffer mix 26.22 ± 4.00 2.6 1.6–8 4.7 ± 1.9 26.49 ± 1.16
Sodium heparin Conventional protocol 20 ± 5.67 2 6.7 ± 1.6 29.01 ± 2.97
1/22 scale down 36.66 ± 15.02 0.37 3.6 ± 0.7 30.25 ± 1.54
1:1 Wash buffer mix 31.83 ± 14.90 3.2 4.6 ± 0.6 26.78 ± 0.95