Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 11;56(9):1506–1524. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00678-5

Table 2.

Quality assessment of included cohort studies using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale

Author Selection Comparability Outcome
Representativeness
of exposed cohort
Selection
of non- exposed cohort
Ascertainment
of exposure
Demonstration
that outcome of interest was not present at start of study
Preoperative
demographic
risks
Other TKA
risk factors
Assessment
of outcome
Follow-up > 
1 year
Loss to
follow- up rate <  = 10%
Total
quality score
Wang (2021) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8
Zhang (2020) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 8
Lin (2020) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 7
Shi (2020) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8
Esposito (2020) 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 7
Samy (2018) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8

Papagiannis

(2016)

1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 7
Choi (2016) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8
Bae (2016) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 8
Anderson (2002) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8

Preoperative demographic risks included age, BMI, sex, if all characteristics were comparable, 1 point was assigned; Other TKA risk factors included single surgeon, or bilateral knee or same surgical approach, anyone of them was comparable, 1 point was assigned; Otherwise, 0 points were assigned.