Table 3.

Distribution of the Studied Groups Regarding Perception of Team-Based Learning (Original and Modified TBL)

Students’ Perception of TBL	Experimental (No.=25) (Mean ±SD)		Controls (No.=30) (Mean ±SD)		Effect Size (95% CI)		Test of Sig	P value
● I prefer TBL, in its current form, compared to the traditional theoretical lecture	3.9±1.2		3.5±1.0		0.33 [(−0.19-(0.87)]		1.24	0.217
● TBL, in its current form, stimulates interest in learning	4.3±0.7		3.7±1.1		0.63 [0.08–1.17]		2.34	0.023*
● TBL, in its current form, enhances my ability to self-directed learning when I studied the learning material before the session	4.1±1.0		3.5±1.1		0.59 [0.04–1.13]		2.18	0.033*
● TBL, in its current form, increased my ability to analyze and solve skills	4.2±0.9		3.8±1.2		0.41 [(−0.12)-(0.95)]		1.53	0.130
● TBL, in its current form, promotes my communication skills	4.2±1.1		3.6±1.2		0.54 [0.004–1.08]		2.02	0.048*
● I feel learning using TBL, in its current form, is more organized and helps easier understanding than traditional lecture	3.9±1.3		3.3±1.2		0.46 [(−0.07) -(1.0)]		1.71	0.093
● TBL, in its current form, increased my workload	2.4±1.2		2.3±1.1		0.05 [(−0.47)-0.58]		0.20	0.839
● I recommend implementing TBL, in its current form, in other courses	2.8±0.8		2.9±0.9		−0.06 [(−0.59)-(0.46)]		0.23	0.813
● I would have liked access to an electronic device for information.	3.7±1.0		3.4±1.1		0.27 [−0.26) -(0.80]		1.0	0.321
Total TBL Perception (out of 45)	33.7±6.4		30.1±7.0		0.53 [(−0.01) -(1.08)]		1.92	0.060
● Good (no, %)	12	48.0	8		26.7	-	4.33	0.115
● Fair	10	40.0	12		40.0
● Poor	3	12.0	10		33.3

Note: *: significant.