Table 2.
Model | Parameters | Values |
---|---|---|
| ||
One-affinity statea | R (pmol/mg protein) | 0.86 ± 0.01 |
KD (nM) | 0.5 ± 0.4 | |
Two state dimer | RT (pmol/mg protein) | 0.61 ± 0.09 |
KD1 (nM) | 0.6 ± 0.3 | |
KD2 (nM) | 2.4 ± 1.2 | |
D C | 0 | |
B50 (nM) | 1.2 |
Competition experiments were performed using variable concentrations of nonr-adiolabeled SCH 23390 and 2.7 nM [3H]SCH 23390. Data for non-linear regression were taken from Fig. 2. R is the maximum specific binding and KD is the equilibrium dissociation constants of the competing ligand (SCH 23390). RT is the total amount of receptor dimers, KD1 and KD2 are, respectively, the equilibrium dissociation constants ofvthe first and second binding of SCH 23390 to the dimer. DC is the “dimer cooperativity” index for the binding of SCH 23390 and B50 is the concentration of the competitor (SCH 23390) providing half saturation. Parameter values are mean ± s.e.m.
F test indicated that no significant improvement is obtained by assuming two-affinity states.