Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 1;107(9):e3816–e3823. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac339

Table 3.

Relative composition of phospholipid and sphingolipid classes in HDL fractions

T2D patients
(n = 20)
Controls
(n = 25)
P value
Glycerophospholipids (nmol/mg)
PC/apoAI 913 ± 149 877 ± 206 0.307
LPC/apoAI 31.2 ± 11.8 24.6 ± 7.2 0.280
PE/apoAI 5.00 ± 2.17 3.55 ± 1.77 0.026
LPE/apoAI 1.21 ± 0.057 0.96 ± 0.44 0.077
LPC + LPE/apoAI 32.4 ± 12.2 25.6 ± 7.5 0.060
PI/apoAI 36.6 ± 12.8 29.9 ± 12.2 0.073
PE-based plasmalogens/apoAI 1.26 ± 0.63 1.73 ± 0.88 0.038
Sphingolipids (nmol/mg)
SM/apoAI 96 ± 30 103  ±  33 0.483
Cer/apoAI 0.387 ± 0.136 0.512 ± 0.206 0.053
S1P/apoAI 0.068 ± 0.020 0.071 ± 0.012 0.689

Data are presented as mean ± SD. The value for each phospho- or sphingolipid class is the sum of the different species belonging to this class. Statistical analysis has been performed on the sums, representing a unique value for each class.

Abbreviations: apoAI, apolipoprotein AI; Cer, ceramide; PC, phosphatidylcholine; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; LPE, lysophosphatidylethanolamine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; S1P, sphingosine-1-phosphate; SM, sphingomyelin.