Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0272162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272162

Table 3. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression results for clinical improvement by utilization type.

Clinical Improvement
Unadjusted model Adjusted Model (a)
n (%) OR 95% CI p aOR 95% CI p
(Intercept) 0.47 0.40–0.54 < .001 0.60 0.34–1.05 .07
Age -- -- -- -- 1.00 0.99–1.02 .43
Sex -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Female (reference) -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Male -- -- -- -- 1.16 0.93–1.45 .20
Unknown -- -- -- -- 1.21 0.93–1.58 .15
Baseline WHO-5 Score -- -- -- -- 0.98 0.96–0.99 .001
Follow-Up Time -- -- -- -- 1.00 0.99–1.00 .71
Utilization Pattern -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Assessments Only (reference) 241 (31.8%) -- -- -- -- -- --
Telecoaching 210 (52.4%) 2.36 1.84–3.03 <0.001 2.45 1.91–3.15 <0.001
Teletherapy 225 (49.5%) 2.1 1.65–2.67 <0.001 2.01 1.57–2.57 <0.001
Telecoaching & Teletherapy 123 (51.7%) 2.29 1.71–3.09 <0.001 2.28 1.67–3.11 <0.001

Note. n = 1,852. WHO-5 = World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index. OR = Odds ratio; CI = Confidence interval; Follow-Up Time = Number of days between baseline and follow-up assessments.

(a) Adjusted model additionally included covariates.

Unadjusted model: Goodness of Fit (Hosmer and Lemeshow): X-squared: 2.4094e-23, df = 8, p-value = 1. Adjusted Model: Goodness of Fit (Hosmer and Lemeshow): X-squared: 6.3826, df = 8, p-value = .60.