Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 19;101(33):e29656. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029656

Table 6.

Network meta-analysis comparisons of effectiveness for reducing pain-related disability.

Fire acupuncture
–0.60 (–2.22, 1.02) Electroacupuncture
–0.76 (–2.68, 1.16) –0.16 (–1.19, 0.88) Warm acupuncture
–1.14 (–3.26, 0.97) –0.54 (–1.91, 0.83) –0.38 (–1.91, 1.14) Western medicine
–1.35 (–3.43, 0.72) –0.75 (–2.05, 0.55) –0.59 (–2.05, 0.87) –0.21 (–1.83, 1.41) Acupoint catgut embedding
–1.35 (–3.16, 0.47) –0.75 (–1.57, 0.07) –0.59 (–1.85, 0.67) –0.20 (–1.72, 1.31) 0.00 (–1.45, 1.46) Sham acupuncture
–1.52 (–3.73, 0.69) –0.91 (–2.42, 0.59) –0.76 (–2.56, 1.05) –0.37 (–2.38, 1.63) –0.16 (–2.12, 1.79) –0.17 (–1.67, 1.33) No treatment
–1.68 (–3.44, 0.07) 1.08 (–1.76,0.40) –0.92 (–1.88, 0.04) –0.54 (–1.73, 0.65) –0.33 (–1.44, 0.78) –0.33 (–1.28, 0.61) –0.17 (–1.78, 1.45) Manual acupuncture
2.10 (–4.04,0.16) 1.49 (–2.56,0.43) 1.34 (–2.60,0.07) –0.95 (–2.40, 0.49) –0.74 (–2.13, 0.64) –0.75 (–2.00, 0.51) –0.58 (–2.39, 1.23) –0.41 (–1.24, 0.41) Usual care

Bold and indicate that SMD < 0.00 is statistically significant.