Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of the radial arm maze (RAM), Barnes maze (BM), and Morris water maze (MWM).
| Behavioral assays | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Radial arm maze | • Suitable for spatial working memory assessment. • Less laborious. |
• Possible exploitation of serial strategy. • Selection of choice-point decision rather than spatial strategy due to olfactory cue trails. |
| Barnes maze | • Suitable for spatial learning and memory assessment. • Ability to track individual trajectory of different exploration patterns. |
• Lack of aversive stimuli may reduce animal’s motivation to escape. • Inconsistent escape behaviors between rats and mice. |
| Morris water maze | • Reliable in various cross-species studies including guinea pigs, rats, and mice. • Ability to track various swimming strategies (spatial, non-spatial, and thigmotaxis). • Able to tract non-cognitive factor based on cued task. |
• Possibility of hypothermia and excessive stress due to the extensive and uncontrolled trials. • Not sensitive for spatial working memory assessment. |
| Contextual fear conditioning test | • Reliable for various rat and mouse strains. • Less affectability to motor dysfunction. • Suitable for evaluating associative learning which involves multiple brain regions (hippocampus, amygdala, and neocortex). |
• Assessment on contextual learning does not necessarily represent spatial learning. • Not sensitive for hippocampal-dependent learning. |
| Object location memory test | • Cost-effective. • Simple protocols without integration with intricate experiment instruments and extensive analysis parameters. |
• Motor dysfunction due to treatment or surgical manipulations may confound the test habituation. • Exhibition of anxiety in normal animals can affect the animals’ learning. |