Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 12;272(6):1021–1032. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01337-w

Table 2.

Connectivity analyses

ROI to ROI connection Statistics p-qFDR
A ROI-to-ROI rs-fc differences between the 3 groups
Group effect F(8,310) = 2.59 0.48
Post hoc analyses
Paranoia vs healthy control groups ø
Non-paranoia vs healthy control groups ø
Paranoia vs non-paranoia groups F(3,81) = 4.84 0.022
Hippo_R-Amygdala_L

T(81) = 2.35

T(81) = 2.01

0.021

0.047

Hippo_L-Amygdala_R
B ROI-to-ROI rs-fc changes with paranoia severity F(3,81) = 7.10 0.001

Hippo_R -Amygdala_R

Hippo_R -Amygdala_L

Hippo_L -Amygdala_L

Hippo_L -Amygdala_R

T(83) = 3.26

T(83) = 3.06

T(83) = 2.29

T(83) = 2.29

0.001

0.003

0.029

0.029

ROI Cluster peak (x, y, z) BA Size Cluster p-FWE Cluster p-qFDR
C ROI-to-voxels rs-fc differences between the 3 groups
Group effect ø
Exploratory analysis paranoia vs non-paranoia groups
Left sup OFC − 50 + 28 − 08 BA 47 240 0.003 0.002
Right sup OFC −38 −71 + 48 BA 39 252 0.002 0.002
D ROI-to-voxels rs-fc changes with paranoia severity
Left sup OFC  + 36 + 24 −16 BA 187 94 0.016 0.015
Left sup OFC −46 + 22 −18 BA 156 94 0.046 0.021

BA broadman area, hippo hippocampus, OFC orbitofrontal cortex, R right, L left