Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 18;13:4854. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32463-1

Table 1.

Binding and kinetics parameters of various VH domains against eIF4E

Kd (nM) kon (S−1M−1) koff (S−1)
VH-1A2 115.2 ± 4.4 3.43 × 105 ± 3.75 × 104 3.78 × 10−2 ± 3.17 × 10−3
VH-1C5 154.3 ± 70.3 2.85 × 105 ± 8.5 × 104 4.11 × 10−2 ± 6.99 × 10−3
VH-1C5D104A (VH-M4) 4.8 ± 1.7 2.46×106 ± 3.89 × 104 1.18 × 10−2 ± 3.90 × 10−3
VH-1C5D104A/S108R 0.94 ± 0.024 2.63 × 106 ± 2.98 × 105 2.48 × 10−3 ± 3.79 × 10−4
VH-1C5D104A/F120I (VH-S2) 0.64 ± 0.06 1.18 × 106 ± 1.85 × 105 7.64 × 10−4 ± 1.80 × 10−4
VH1-C5D104A/S108R/F120I (VH-S4) 0.057 ± 0.004 5.18 × 106 ± 8.55 × 105 2.96 × 10−4 ± 6.47 × 10−5
4E-BP14ALA (1:1) 0.60 ± 0.14 1.05 × 1010 ± 1.48 × 109 5.93 ± 0.56
kon1, kon2 koff1, koff2
4E-BP14ALA (2 state) 0.68 ± 0.13 8.35 × 106 ± 4.90 × 106,1.70 × 10−2 ± 1.08 × 10−2 3.19 × 10−4 ± 7.91 × 10−5, 1.84 × 10−4 ± 7.00 × 10−5

Kd, kon and koff values were derived from SPR experiments using either single cycle or multi cycle injection experiments against eIF4E amine coupled to a CM5 sensorchip. Parameters were derived using a 1:1 site binding model. However, with regards to 4E-BP14ALA, binding parameters were initially determined using a 1:1 site binding model, which generated a poor fit and physically irrelevant Kon and Koff values beyond the detection limit of the machine. This analysis was superseded with a 2-state analysis, which generated more meaningful kinetic parameters. The use of a 2-state model is supported by the following reasons: (1) 4E-BP14ALA undergoes a disorder to order transition upon binding eIF4E and, (2) it interacts at eIF4E through 2 binding sites. Binding and kinetic data values (mean ± standard error) shown in the table were calculated from n = 2 independent experiments. Data shown for 4E-BP14ALA was calculated from n = 3 independent experiments. Source data is provided in the Source Data File.