Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 17;10(4):e002890. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-002890

Table 3.

Confirmatory factor analyses testing a one-factor solution of the 12-Item Hypoglycemia Impact Profile in four groups: factor loadings, fit indices, and internal consistency

Type 1 diabetes
(n=1071)
Type 2 diabetes
(n=194)
Native English speaker
(n=1101)
Non-native English speaker
(n=164)
Factor loadings
Physical health 0.69 0.74 0.68 0.72
Financial situation 0.51 0.61 0.52 0.49
Relationships 0.64 0.58 0.62 0.72
Leisure activities 0.79 0.75 0.78 0.84
Work or studies 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.79
Emotional well-being 0.78 0.81 0.77 0.84
Sleep 0.67 0.72 0.69 0.72
Dietary freedom 0.51 0.66 0.54 0.48
Sex life 0.53 0.62 0.53 0.59
Independence 0.76 0.85 0.79 0.76
Spontaneity 0.76 0.83 0.78 0.79
Keep fit/be active 0.72 0.76 0.74 0.72
Model fit statistics
McDonald’s ꙍ 0.91 0.93 0.91 0.92
χ2 test statistics 228.41 135.91 231.55 63.56
df 54 54 54 54
Robust CFI 0.96 0.90 0.95 0.99
Robust TLI 0.95 0.88 0.94 0.99
Robust RMSEA (CI) 0.07 (0.06 to 0.08) 0.11 (0.09 to 0.14) 0.07 (0.06 to 0.08) 0.04 (<0.001 to 0.07)
SRMR 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.04

CFI, comparative fit index; RMSEA, robust root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index.