Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2022 Aug 5;13:962775. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.962775

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2022 Feng, Wang, Hu, Lu, ling, Huang and Jiang

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

PMC Copyright notice

Effect of DOP treatment on gut microbial composition, n = 6. (A) Microbial distribution at the phylum level. (B) Microbial distribution of the top 30-genus level. (C) Cladograms representing the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) results. (D) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) results between different experimental groups. LDA scores above 3.00 and p < 0.05 are shown. (E-J) Relative abundance of Actinobacteria, Deferribacteres, Prevotellaceae_UCG_001, Lachospiraceae_ND3007_group, Alloprevotella, and Blautia between all groups. Note: compared with the PCOS group: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; compared with the NS group: # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01.