Table 5.
Paths estimates | Estimates (b)a | SE | Lower | Upper | p value | Support for hypothesis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct effects | ||||||
Fair employment practices—> life satisfaction | 0.06 | 0.10 | − 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.56 | H1: Not Supported |
Managerial consideration- > life satisfaction | 0.07 | 0.12 | − 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.84 | H2: Not Supported |
Mediated effects | ||||||
Fair employment practices—> economic inclusion > life satisfaction | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.00 | H3: Supported |
Managerial consideration- > non-rank sensitive inclusion—> life satisfaction | 0.01 | 0.04 | − 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.72 | H4: Not Supported |
Moderated mediation effects via economic inclusion (mediator) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mediated effectsa,b | SE | LLCI | ULCI | Support for hypothesis | |
Fair employment practices (X) × learning orientation (LO) (W) | 0.48 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.83 | H5: Supported |
Life Satisfaction (Y) | |||||
Low LO (− 1 SD) | 0.03 | 0.03 | − 0.03 | 0.11 | |
Moderate LO (M) | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.14 | |
High LO (+ 1SD) | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.22 | |
Index of Moderated Mediation | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.23 |
Moderated mediated effects via non-rank sensitive inclusion (med) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Managerial consideration (X) × learning orientation (LO) (W) | 0.05 (ns) | 0.06 | − 0.05 | 0.17 | H6: Not supported |
Life satisfaction (Y) | |||||
Low LO (− 1 SD) | 0.02 | 0.03 | − 0.03 | 0.10 | |
Moderate LO (M) | 0.03 | 0.04 | − 0.04 | 0.11 | |
High LO (+ 1 SD) | 0.04 | 0.04 | − 0.04 | 0.12 | |
Index of moderated mediation | 0.01 | 0.02 | − 0.02 | 0.05 |
X predictor, W moderator, Med mediator, Y outcome variable, ns non-significant
* < 0.05
aCommon method variance (CMV) bias adjusted estimates
bUnstandardized estimates