Ocean warming has continued unabated, owing to climate change.1 Water has a much larger capacity to absorb heat than the atmosphere; thus, the heat content of the oceans has increased disproportionally. In fact, of accumulated heat from global climate change is absorbed by the oceans, masking and slowing land surface warming.1 The ocean warming process has accelerated over recent years and resulted in a range expansion of tropical marine species to higher latitudes and altered marine ecosystems.1 Vibrio pathogens are part of these marine ecosystems, and their spread is being accompanied by human exposure and related illnesses and mortality, as well as their associated costs.2
Vibrio species are physically attached to tiny planktonic crustaceans known as copepods, which serve as the host organism in this commensal relationship.3 These bacteria can cause large-scale cholera epidemics or sporadic infections, mainly as a result of consumption of uncooked seafood or exposure to recreational seawater. Twelve Vibrio species are associated with infections in humans. These include V. cholerae (serogroups O1 and O139), the causative agent of cholera epidemics. Another three species—V. parahaemolyticus, V. alginolyticus, and V. vulnificus—can cause sporadic but potentially severe gastrointestinal illnesses and wound infections, which can advance to outcomes such as necrotizing fasciitis, amputation, septicemia, and death.4 The disease burden from these noncholera Vibrio infections is not extensive, but the incidence is increasing.4
Vibrio bacteria thrive in warm, brackish water and have expanded their habitat owing to the warming of the oceans.5–7 In the summer of 2004, an outbreak occurred in Alaska as a result of the consumption of raw oysters contaminated with V. parahaemolyticus, north of any previously recorded infection with this pathogen.8 Similarly, V. parahaemolyticus has appeared in northern Spain,9,10 where ocean warming has also contributed to the spread of pathogenic Vibrio bacteria.11 There has been a documented cross-oceanic migration and northbound expansion of plankton in response to the warming of oceans,12 and it is possible that Vibrio species are hitchhiking along with their hosts.13
A new study by Sheahan et al.14 in this issue of Environmental Health Perspectives examines the influence of climate change on vibriosis in the United States and projects future health and economic impacts. The authors took advantage of an invaluable resource that is available only in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) started collecting Vibrio cholera case data in 1997 and expanded their national surveillance efforts to all vibriosis cases in 2007.15 In contrast, there is no continent-wide surveillance data available for other Vibrio pathogens in Europe. For example, Vibrio cholera of serogroups O1 or O139 is a reportable disease in the European Union, but other Vibrio species are not.16 The authors analyzed the CDC’s rich Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance (COVIS) database to address the study objectives. Although there are limitations to COVIS, such as underreporting and potential exposure misclassification, it is nevertheless unique and the largest database of its kind.
The authors applied an exposure–response function between sea surface temperature and vibriosis cases that has been validated in different settings17 and projected the annual disease incidence to the end of the century under the 4.5 and 8.5 Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios. Their model projects an incidence increase of and 100%, respectively, under these two RCPs. They further projected that the cost of illness will exceed $5.2 billion USD and $7.3 billion USD annually under RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively, up from $2.2 billion USD in 2018. These staggering economic impacts are due in part to the potential severity of health outcomes and losses in productivity but, most significantly, to the high mortality costs from V. vulnificus, which is the deadliest seafood-borne pathogen in the United States.18,19
The potential human and financial costs of vibriosis attributable to climate change15,20 quantified in this economic assessment by Sheahan et al.14 are compelling reasons to consider adaptation measures to attenuate climate change impacts.21,22 The direct relationship between Vibrio infections and sea surface temperature lends itself to a climate-driven forecasting and early warning system.17 In the absence of continent-wide surveillance of Vibrio pathogens in Europe, the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) has operationalized an early warning system in Stockholm called the ECDC Vibrio Map Viewer.17 Through remote sensing, it monitors global environmental conditions and sea surface temperature and salinity to predict conditions that are suitable for Vibrio infections (Figure 1).17,23
Figure 1.

ECDC Vibrio Map Viewer with a screen shot of the U.S. East Coast on 21 July 2021. Areas depicted in dark gray indicate high to very high environmental suitability for vibriosis, and areas in light gray indicate low to very low environmental suitability. Source: ECDC; https://geoportal.ecdc.europa.eu/vibriomapviewer/. Note: ECDC, European Center for Disease Prevention and Control.
ECDC staff monitor the Vibrio Map Viewer on a daily basis during the summer months to identify coastal areas suitable for Vibrio infections. Reports are published biweekly in the ECDC’s Communicable Disease Threats Report (CDTR), which is distributed to all government epidemiologists in Europe.24 The CDTR can issue an alert when the 5-d forecast of the ECDC Vibrio Map Viewer predicts the environmental suitability for Vibrio infections to increase at a certain coastline, such as along the Baltic Sea. The CDTR provides options for prevention and control, such as beach closures, notifying health care providers, and encouraging at-risk individuals (e.g., children, the elderly, cancer patients, immunocompromised individuals) to avoid exposure to Vibrio bacteria from recreational water use or consumption of raw seafood.17
The ECDC Vibrio Map Viewer is a climate change adaptation tool that can be used for marine environments anywhere in the world, including the Chesapeake Bay, the largest estuary in the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States. Needless to say, in light of global warming, these types of predictive models based on remote sensing data are needed not only for Vibrio bacteria25,26 but also for other climate-sensitive pathogens.21 The analysis by Sheahan et al. presented in this issue of the EHP14 will serve as the backbone of cost-effectiveness analyses for these types of adaptation measures and can help reduce morbidity and mortality from climate change and their associated costs, increase the effectiveness of interventions, and make efficient use of scarce public health resources in the age of global environmental change.
Refers to https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP9999a
References
- 1.Bindoff NL, Cheung WWL, Kairo JG, Arístegui J, Guinder VA, Hallberg R, et al. 2019. Chapter 5. Changing Ocean, Marine Ecosystems, and Dependent Communities. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Pörtner HO, Roberts DC, Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Tignor M, Poloczanska E, et al., eds. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 447–587. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Semenza JC. 2020. Cascading risks of waterborne diseases from climate change. Nat Immunol 21(5):484–487, PMID: , 10.1038/s41590-020-0631-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huq A, Small EB, West PA, Huq MI, Rahman R, Colwell RR. 1983. Ecological relationships between Vibrio cholerae and planktonic crustacean copepods. Appl Environ Microbiol 45(1):275–283, PMID: , 10.1128/aem.45.1.275-283.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baker-Austin C, Oliver JD, Alam M, Ali A, Waldor MK, Qadri F, et al. 2018. Vibrio spp. infections. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4(1):8–19, PMID: , 10.1038/s41572-018-0005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Trinanes J, Martinez-Urtaza J. 2021. Future scenarios of risk of Vibrio infections in a warming planet: a global mapping study. Lancet Planet Health 5(7):e426–e435, PMID: , 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00169-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Levy S. 2015. Warming trend: how climate shapes Vibrio ecology. Environ Health Perspect 123(4):A82–A89, PMID: , 10.1289/ehp.123-A82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Romanello M, McGushin A, Di Napoli C, Drummond P, Hughes N, Jamart L, et al. 2021. The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future. Lancet 398(10311):1619–1662, PMID: , 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01787-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McLaughlin JB, DePaola A, Bopp CA, Martinek KA, Napolilli NP, Allison CG, et al. 2005. Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters. N Engl J Med 353(14):1463–1470, PMID: , 10.1056/NEJMoa051594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martinez-Urtaza J, Bowers JC, Trinanes J, DePaola A. 2010. Climate anomalies and the increasing risk of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus illnesses. Food Res Int 43(7):1780–1790, 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martinez-Urtaza J, Baker-Austin C, Jones JL, Newton AE, Gonzalez-Aviles GD, DePaola A. 2013. Spread of Pacific Northwest Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain. N Engl J Med 369(16):1573–1574, PMID: , 10.1056/NEJMc1305535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vezzulli L, Colwell RR, Pruzzo C. 2013. Ocean warming and spread of pathogenic vibrios in the aquatic environment. Microb Ecol 65(4):817–825, PMID: , 10.1007/s00248-012-0163-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beaugrand G, Reid PC, Ibañez F, Lindley JA, Edwards M. 2002. Reorganization of North Atlantic marine copepod biodiversity and climate. Science 296(5573):1692–1694, PMID: , 10.1126/science.1071329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vezzulli L, Grande C, Reid PC, Hélaouët P, Edwards M, Höfle MG, et al. 2016. Climate influence on Vibrio and associated human diseases during the past half-century in the coastal North Atlantic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113(34):E5062–E5071, PMID: , 10.1073/pnas.1609157113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sheahan M, Gould CA, Neumann JE, Kinney PL, Hoffmann S, Fant C, et al. 2022. Examining the relationship between climate change and vibriosis in the United States: projected health and economic impacts for the 21st century. Environ Health Perspect 130(8):087007, 10.1289/EHP9999a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Vibrio species causing vibriosis. Surveillance. Page last reviewed 5 March 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/vibrio/surveillance.html [accessed 9 July 2022].
- 16.ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control). 2018. ECDC activities on surveillance. Page last updated 29 June 2018. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/all-topics-z/surveillance-and-disease-data/diseases-and-special-health-issues-under-eu-surveillance [accessed 4 February 2022].
- 17.Semenza JC, Trinanes J, Lohr W, Sudre B, Löfdahl M, Martinez-Urtaza J, et al. 2017. Environmental suitability of Vibrio infections in a warming climate: an early warning system. Environ Health Perspect 125(10):107004, PMID: , 10.1289/EHP2198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oliver JD, Jones JL. 2015. Chapter 66. Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus. In Molecular Medical Microbiology. Tang YW, Sussman M, Liu D, Poxton I, Schwartzman J, eds. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1169–1186. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Iwamoto M, Ayers T, Mahon BE, Swerdlow DL. 2010. Epidemiology of seafood-associated infections in the United States. Clin Microbiol Rev 23(2):399–411, PMID: , 10.1128/CMR.00059-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ebi KL, Ogden NH, Semenza JC, Woodward A. 2017. Detecting and attributing health burdens to climate change. Environ Health Perspect 125(8):085004, PMID: , 10.1289/EHP1509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Semenza JC, Paz S. 2021. Climate change and infectious disease in Europe: impact, projection and adaptation. Lancet Reg Health Eur 9:100230, PMID: , 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Semenza JC. 2021. Lateral public health: advancing systemic resilience to climate change. Lancet Reg Health Eur 9:100231, PMID: , 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.ECDC. 2022. ECDC Vibrio Map Viewer. https://geoportal.ecdc.europa.eu/vibriomapviewer/ [accessed 9 July 2022].
- 24.ECDC. 2022. Weekly threats reports (CDTR). Communicable disease threats reports. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/all-topics-z/threats-and-outbreaks/weekly-threats-reports-cdtr [accessed 9 July 2022].
- 25.Lobitz B, Beck L, Huq A, Wood B, Fuchs G, Faruque ASG, et al. 2000. Climate and infectious disease: use of remote sensing for detection of Vibrio cholerae by indirect measurement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(4):1438–1443, PMID: , 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grimes DJ, Ford TE, Colwell RR, Baker-Austin C, Martinez-Urtaza J, Subramaniam A, et al. 2014. Viewing marine bacteria, their activity and response to environmental drivers from orbit: satellite remote sensing of bacteria. Microb Ecol 67(3):489–500, PMID: , 10.1007/s00248-013-0363-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
