Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 19;12(36):23692–23703. doi: 10.1039/d2ra03709b

Photocatalytic degradation effect of the CQDs/ZnO composites using different carbon sources.

Carbon source of CQDs Light source Pollutant Pollutant concentration (mg L−1) Photocatalyst dosage (g L−1) Irradiation times (min) Degradation rate (%) Reference
Glucose Halogen lamp (500 W) Methylene blue 10 0.1 30 96 3
Sucrose Halogen lamp with a filter (500 W, wavelength > 420 nm) Rhodamine B 10 0.1 60 98 19
d-Fructose Xenon lamp (wavelength > 420 nm) Rhodamine B 2.3 1.5 × 10−4 105 94 20
l-Ascorbic acid Osram lamp (400 W) Methylene blue 50 1 120 87 21
l-Ascorbic acid Blended mercury lamp (250 W) Methylene blue 30 1 120 100 22
Sodium citrate Xenon lamp (300 W) Methylene blue 10 0.1 60 98 23
Coffee grounds UVB lamp (6 W, wavelength: 360 nm) Methylene blue 5 0.25 150 80 15
Peach juice UV lamp Methylene blue 20 2 60 95 25
Graphite rods Xenon lamp (18 mW cm−2) Tetracycline 10 0.5 30 100 24
WRN Purple light lamp (20 W, wavelength: 405 nm) Methylene blue 20 2 10 98.88 This work
Tetracycline 20 2 10 98.21
Malachite green 20 2 10 98.66
Methyl violet 20 2 10 98.11
Basic fuchsin 20 2 40 99.39
Rhodamine B 20 2 80 99.33
Aniline 20 2 80 99.90