Skip to main content
. 2022 May 26;6(8):1079–1086. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01350-6

Table 2.

ITT effects of in-person school activities on student attendance, dropout risk and standardized test scores

(1) (2) (3)
Attendance Standardized test scores Dropout risk
Panel A: Diff-in-diff: middle-school in-person activities 0.010 0.001 0.001
(0.001) (0.001) (0.001)
P < 0.001 P = 0.35 P = 0.29
Panel B: Diff-in-diff: high-school in-person activities 0.007 0.024 0.002
(0.001) (0.0001) (0.002)
P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P = 0.39
Panel C: Triple-differences in-person activities −0.002 0.023 0.001
(0.002) (0.001) (0.001)
P = 0.04 P = 0.001 P = 0.31
Grade fixed effects Yes Yes Yes
Matching Yes Yes Yes
N 3,701,482 2,624,943 3,701,482

Notes: The table displays ITT estimates of resuming in-person school activities on student attendance (column 1), standardized test scores (column 2) and high dropout risk (column 3). Quarterly data on attendance reflect online or in-person attendance and/or assignment completion (handed in online or in-person) over each quarter (in p.p.), averaged across maths and Portuguese classes; standardized test scores from quarterly standardized tests (AAPs), averaging maths and Portuguese scores for that school quarter; and high dropout risk = 1 if the student had no maths or Portuguese grades on record for that school quarter, and 0 otherwise. Panels A and B estimate treatment effects through differences-in-differences, contrasting the variation in outcomes between Q1 and Q4 of 2020 within municipalities that authorized schools to reopen versus those that did not. Panel A restricts attention to middle-school students, and panel B to high-school students. Panel C estimates treatment effects through a triple-differences estimator, which contrasts the differences-in-differences estimates for middle- and high-school students (for whom in-person classes could resume within municipalities that authorized schools to reopen in Q4 of 2020). Column 2 controls for a third-degree polynomial of propensity scores, and re-weights observations by the inverse of their propensity score. All columns are OLS regressions, with standard errors clustered at the municipality level. P values are computed from two-sided t-tests that each coefficient is equal to zero.