Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 May 6;75(8):2691–2701. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.04.097

Table 6.

Complication Rates in Comparative Studies (Mini-Plate versus Reconstruction Bar)

Study Year Fixation No. Patients Infection (%) Fistula (%) Non-Union/Mal-Union (%) Wound Dehiscence (%) Total Flap Loss (%) Partial Flap Loss (%) Plate-Related Complications (%)

Al-Bustani 2016 Mini-Plate 13 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) NR 2 (15.4) 1 (7.7) NR 4 (30.8)
Reconstruction Bar 12 1 (8.3) 0 (0.0) NR 0 (0.0) 1 (8.3) NR 0 (0.0)
Kim 2015 Mini-Plate 26 NR NR 4 (15.4) NR 7 (26.9) NR 11 (42.3)
Reconstruction Bar 21 NR NR 4 (19.0) NR 5 (23.8) NR 7 (33.3)
Robey 2008 Mini-Plate 86 NR NR 8 (9.3) NR 9 (10.4) NR 16 (18.6)
Reconstruction Bar 31 NR NR 2 (6.5) NR 5 (16.1) NR 3 (9.7)

NR, not reported