Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;36(9):1747–1753. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02032-3

Table 1.

Quality assessment of articles.

Author (date) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
Moshirfar et al. (2018) [21] Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vukich et al. (2018) [9] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Linn et al. (2018) [23] Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Moshirfar et al. (2017) [22] Yes NR Yes No No Yes Yes
Moshirfar et al. (2016) [24] Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Dexl et al. (2015) [25] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Abbouda et al. (2014) [27] Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Agca et al. (2014) [14] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Huseynova et al. (2014) [26] Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No
Tomita et al. (2014) [28] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Tomita and Huseynova (2014) [13] Yes NR NR Yes Yes Yes Yes
Dexl et al. (2012) [10] Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes
Dexl et al. (2012) [17] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Seyeddain et al. (2013) [15] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Seyeddain et al. (2012) [16] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Dexl et al. (2011) [18] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Waring IV (2011) [19] Yes NR Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Yımaz et al. (2011) [20] Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

(Q1): Is the study oriented to a clear question?; (Q2): Were all the patients results taken into account?; (Q3): Was the follow-up complete?; (Q4): Were the same conditions used in surgical treatment?; (Q5): Was the intervention clearly described?; (Q6): Was the duration of follow-up adequate?; (Q7): Were the results described correctly?

NR not reported, Q question.