Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 19;11:256. doi: 10.1038/s41377-022-00946-x

Fig. 4. Quantitative comparison of luminescence rise and decay times of YbEr and Yb@YbEr samples undergoing UC-LRET.

Fig. 4

Luminescence rise and decay times for energy levels. 4S3/2 (525–550 nm) (ac, eg) and 4F9/2 (650 nm) (d, h) emission from (open symbol) YbEr core only and (solid symbol) Yb@YbEr core-shell UCNPs respectively, at a rising concentration of Rose Bengal attached to their surface. Various excitation modes were compared: a, e 520 nm 10 ns pulse from OPO laser; b, f 980 nm 10 ns pulse from OPO laser; c, g 980 nm 4 ms pulse from TTL-triggered 10 W CW laser diode. The luminescence rise times (τR) (ad) and averaged decay (τD) (eh) components are shown separately