Abstract
Mycotic aneurysms are a rare complication of systemic infections, where the arterial vessel wall becomes dilated secondary to bacterial, fungal, or viral infection. The incidence of mycotic aneurysms is rare but carries a significant mortality risk. Patients with mycotic aneurysms can have wide-ranging clinical presentations depending on the site of the aneurysm. Our case discusses one of the most encountered emergency department (ED) presentations, i.e., nausea and vomiting, as a presenting symptom of a patient found to have a mycotic aneurysm.
A 56-year-old patient with a history of HIV, unknown viral load or CD4 count, and admitted IV drug use presented to the ED by ambulance with multiple episodes of nausea and non-bloody vomiting. The patient was noted to be afebrile but met systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, necessitating a further workup. CT of the abdomen and pelvis was notable for a saccular aneurysm involving the infrarenal aorta with a large thrombosed component.
This case highlights the importance of early consideration of infected (mycotic) aneurysms in the appropriate patient setting, as delayed diagnosis increases the risk of rupture and death. In a case of non-specific nausea and vomiting, it is not unreasonable to assume this presentation could be attributed to a more benign process, delaying the diagnosis. It may, therefore, be prudent for emergency service providers to add mycotic aneurysms to the differential diagnosis for patients with appropriate risk factors, as presentations of mycotic aneurysms vary greatly.
Keywords: mycotic aneurysm, id critical care, critical emergency medicine, cardiothoracic imaging, infectious disease pathology, mycotic aortic aneurysm
Introduction
Mycotic aneurysms are a rare complication of systemic infections in which the arterial vessel wall becomes dilated secondary to bacterial, fungal, or viral infection. It is important to recognize this disease process early, as non-treatment can lead to fulminant sepsis, arterial rupture, and death. Approximately 7-24% of infected aortic aneurysms demonstrate free rupture, and a further 47-61% demonstrate contained or impending rupture at presentation [1]. Patients with mycotic aneurysms can have wide-ranging clinical presentations, depending on the aneurysm site, with the most common physical exam finding being a tender indurated abdominal mass and bruit [2]. Reported presenting symptoms range from hemoptysis to GI bleeding to heart failure [3,4]. This case report highlights a common, non-specific emergency department (ED) complaint, i.e., non-specific nausea and vomiting, with the importance of consideration and early recognition of mycotic aneurysms.
Case presentation
A 56-year-old male with a history of HIV, unknown viral load, and admitted IV drug use presented to the ED by ambulance with multiple episodes of nausea and vomiting. On arrival, his vitals were notable for a respiratory rate (RR) of 34 per minute and heart rate (HR) of 126 beats per minute. The rest of the vitals including temperature, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were within normal limits. Physical examination was notable for tenderness to the epigastric region. An electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus tachycardia. Chest X-ray showed bilateral opacities, consistent with multifocal pneumonia. Pertinent laboratory values returned as noted in Table 1.
Table 1. Pertinent laboratory values.
| Lab | Results |
| White blood cell count | 10.8 K/cmm (4.8-10.8 K/cmm) |
| % Neutrophils | 92.6% (42.2-75.2%) |
| Lactic acid | 3.5 mmol/L (0.5-2.2 mmol/L) |
| Troponin | 1.17 ng/mL (<0.03 ng/mL) |
| D-dimer | >4.4 mg/L (0.5 mg/L) |
While in the ED, the patient began to deteriorate clinically, with a RR of 50 per minute and HR of 215 beats per minute. CT of the abdomen and pelvis was performed and showed a saccular aneurysm involving the infrarenal aorta with a large thrombosed component. The aneurysm measured 5 cm in length by 10.2 cm transverse by 3.6 cm anteroposterior (Figure 1).
Figure 1. CT scan showing saccular aneurysm with thrombosed component.
The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit where blood cultures that were drawn in the ED for the sepsis workup returned positive for Staphylococcus aureus. The patient was subsequently transferred to another facility for cardiothoracic surgery evaluation and management.
Discussion
Non-specific gastrointestinal complaints are one of the leading causes of emergency room visits each year, making up about 5-10% of all United States ED visits annually [5]. With a wide range of possible etiologies, a proper history and physical examination are helpful in narrowing down a diagnosis. Ultimately, however, imaging is often required to make a specific diagnosis. Mycotic aneurysm manifestations are non-specific and can easily be missed. Populations at risk for mycotic aneurysms include IV drug users, immunocompromised hosts, and patients who are status post invasive intravascular procedures [6]. Physical exam findings can vary, as these findings are dependent on the location of the aneurysm. However, the most common finding encountered in these patients is a tender indurated abdominal mass and bruit [2]. Labs are non-specific for the identification of these infected aneurysms. White blood cell count and inflammatory markers are usually elevated in infected aneurysms, but they are non-specific. Blood cultures, while important to obtain, take time to come back and do not add information in the early stages of the diagnosis. Ultimately, radiologic findings are the most sensitive and specific indicators for infected aneurysms, with the imaging modality of choice being CT angiography (CTA) [7]. Findings on CTA that are highly suggestive of mycotic aneurysm include saccular aneurysm with lobulated contours, soft tissue inflammation surrounding a vessel, intramural air around the blood vessel, and perianeurysmal fluid collection [8]. Our patient presented with non-specific nausea and vomiting. As there was no reported abdominal pain, it is not unreasonable to assume that there might be instances where this presentation could be attributed to a more benign process, further delaying the diagnosis and increasing mortality risk. Ultimately, the CT scan was able to provide the definitive diagnosis. However, the main barrier to diagnosis is not a lack of a CT scanner, but a low index of suspicion. This case highlights the importance of developing a broad differential diagnosis, early consideration, recognition, and treatment of infected (mycotic) aneurysms.
Conclusions
Our patient presented with nausea and vomiting, one of the most commonly encountered ED visit complaints. Given the unremarkable physical exam, this presentation could easily be attributed to a more benign process, delaying the diagnosis and increasing mortality risk. This case highlights the importance of early consideration of infected (mycotic) aneurysms in patients with the appropriate risk factors, as presentations vary greatly.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Bacteriologic and surgical determinants of survival in patients with mycotic aneurysms. Brown SL, Busuttil RW, Baker JD, Machleder HI, Moore WS, Barker WF. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6436514/ J Vasc Surg. 1984;1:541–547. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mycotic aneurysm. New concepts in therapy. Johnson JR, Ledgerwood AM, Lucas CE. Arch Surg. 1983;118:577–582. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390050053010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mycotic superior mesenteric pseudoaneurysm draining into a vein. Shiraishi M, Ohki S, Misawa Y. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:91–93. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.251645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Massive upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to a ruptured superior mesenteric artery aneurysm duodenum fistula. Zhao J. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:735–737. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pearls and pitfalls in the emergency department evaluation of abdominal pain. Kamin RA, Nowicki TA, Courtney DS, Powers RD. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003;21:61–72. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(02)00080-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Presentation, diagnosis, and management of arterial mycotic pseudoaneurysms in injection drug users. Tsao JW, Marder SR, Goldstone J, Bloom AI. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002;16:652–662. doi: 10.1007/s10016-001-0124-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Infected aortic aneurysms: CT appearance. Vogelzang RL, Sohaey R. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988;12:109–112. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198801000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Infected aortic aneurysms: CT features. Azizi L, Henon A, Belkacem A, Monnier-Cholley L, Tubiana JM, Arrivé L. Abdom Imaging. 2004;29:716–720. doi: 10.1007/s00261-004-0171-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

