Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 20.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 May 19;194(2):413–422. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06623-2

Table 3.

Pre-systemic therapy cognition by molecular sub-type among older patients with non-metastatic breast cancer

a. Mean (SE) adjusted baseline cognitive scores by molecular subtype

Mean scores HR +, HER2−(n = 493) HR +, HER2 + (n = 51) HR−,HER2 + (n = 15) HR−, PR−, HER2− (triple negative) (n = 56) p-value1
Self-reported cognitive problems (FACT cog PCI)* 60.8 (0.7) 59.7 (1.6) 50.9 (2.8) 61.0 (1.5) 0.006
APE z-score ** − .296 (0.036) − .237 (0.090) − .350 (0.159) − .197 (0.084) 0.621
LM z-score** − .306 (0.045) − .377 (0.112) − .578 (0.199) − .430 (0.104) 0.370
b. Mean rates of baseline cognitive impairment by molecular subtype

Percent impaired HR +, HER2− (n = 460) (%) HR +, HER2 + (n = 46) (%) HR−, HER2 + (n = 14) (%) HR−, PR−, HER2− (triple negative) (n = 53) (%) p-value2

Self-reported cognitive problems (FACT cog PCI)* 19.4 28.3 35.7 18.9 0.245
APE domain** 17.2 15.7 20.0 10.7 0.636
LM domain** 14.2 7.8 13.3 23.2 0.150

Adjusted for age, race, site; p values based on ANCOVA

p-values based on Chi-square tests

*

Scores on the FACT-Cog perceived cognitive impairment scale range from 0 to 72, with higher scores represent better cognitive function. 3–5 point differences are considered clinically meaningful and a score of < 54 is considered impaired

**

Z-scores for neuropsychological tests within each domain range from − 3 to + 3, with a mean of 0. A positive score indicates better cognitive performance and a negative score reflects worse than average scores. Having one of the tests within the domain with a score of < 2SD from the mean or two tests < 1.5 SD from the mean are considered impairment