Table 5.
Direction of association with QoL | Number of papers that include the factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
Individual factors | ↑ Age | ↑↓ | 6 |
Gender: female | ↓ | 2 | |
↑ Educational level | ↑ | 3 | |
Employment status: being employed | ↑ | 3 | |
Marital status: being single | ↓ | 2 | |
↑ Personal resourcefulness | ↑ | 1 | |
↑ Sense of coherence | ↑ | 1 | |
↑ Physical health | ↑ | 2 | |
↑ Knowledge about the illness | ↑ | 1 | |
Family factors | Kinship: parent | ↓ | 6 |
↑ Family income | ↑ | 3 | |
Number of dependent members (≥ 2) | ↓ | 1 | |
Living with the patient | ↓ | 2 | |
Characteristics of the patient with SMI | ↑ Age | ↑ | 1 |
↑ Educational level | ↑ | 1 | |
Employment status: being employed | ↑ | 1 | |
Diagnosis: schizophrenia vs. depression | ↑ | 1 | |
Better clinical status | ↑ | 2 | |
↑ Number of hospitalisations | ↓ | 1 | |
↑ Patient’s functioning | ↑ | 2 | |
Factors related to the disease process | Onset of the illness (≥ 45 years) | ↑ | 1 |
Being exposed to the patient’s illness (≥ 10 years) | ↓ | 2 | |
↑ Illness perception | ↓ | 1 | |
Perception of illness under their own control | ↓ | 1 | |
↑ Objective burden | ↓ | 3 | |
↑ Subjective burden | ↓ | 4 | |
↑ Psychological distress | ↓ | 1 | |
↑ Anxiety symptoms | ↓ | 1 | |
↑ Depression symptoms | ↓ | 4 | |
↑ Social readjustment | ↓ | 1 | |
Poor health | ↓ | 1 | |
↑ Family alienation | ↓ | 1 | |
Contextual factors | Country (Chilean vs. French) | ↓ | 1 |
↑ Social stigma | ↓ | 2 | |
Attending Day care | ↓ | 1 | |
↑ Social support | ↑ | 2 |
↑ = positive association with QoL; ↓ = negative association with QoL