Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 7;32(9):3023–3033. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06189-4

Table 3.

Comparisons of the FT score readings and changes during the follow-up period between PRYGB and RRYGB

PRYGB
n = 504
RRYGB
n = 150
Adjusted mean difference a P-value
M (SE) M (SE) Est (95% CI)
FT score
  Post-operative
  1st year 21.4 (0.09) 22.9 (0.14) 1.47 (1.3, 1.6) (< .001)
  2nd year 23.0 (0.14) 23.1 (0.19) 0.02 (− 0.2, 0.2) (.862)
  3rd year 24.1 (0.14) 24.2 (0.19) 0.08 (− 0.1, 0.3) (.412)
  4th year 24.1 (0.16) 24.2 (0.22) 0.04 (− 0.2, 0.3) (.778)
  5th year 23.6 (0.14) 23.7 (0.20) 0.05 (− 0.2, 0.2) (.653)
  Change in the FT score
  2nd year 1.6 (0.18) 0.1 (0.26)  − 1.45 (− 1.8, − 1.1) (< .001)
  3rd year 1.1 (0.21) 1.1 (0.27) 0.02 (− 0.3, 0.3) (.919)
  4th year 0.1 (0.19) 0 (0.24)  − 0.03 (− 0.3, 0.2) (.822)
  5th year  − 0.5 (0.23)  − 0.5 (0.34) 0.03 (− 0.4, 0.5) (.900)

a Adjusted for age and sex using multiple linear regression estimated using generalized estimation equation and weighted by inverse propensity score weights, where primary RYGB is the reference group; FT, food tolerance test; M, mean; SE, standard error; Est., estimated value; PRYGB, primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; RRYGB, revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass