Table 5.
Comparison of the early and late impacts of PRYGB and RRYGB on main associated medical conditions
| n = total | No change | Improved | Resolved |
Adj. prop (95% CI) |
P | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |||||||
| Hypertension | ||||||||||||
| 1st year | ||||||||||||
| PRYGB | 157 | 0 | 0% | 21 | 13% | 136 | 87% | 9.33 |
2.92 (1.09, 7.85) |
(.033) | ||
| RRYGB | 48 | 0 | 0% | 15 | 32% | 33 | 68% | 8.40 | ||||
| 5th year | ||||||||||||
| PRYGB | 157 | 0 | 0% | 16 | 10% | 141 | 90% | 9.50 | 2.90 | (.099) | ||
| RRYGB | 48 | 4 | 8% | 7 | 14% | 37 | 76% | 8.35 | (0.82, 10.26) | |||
| Dyslipidemia | ||||||||||||
| 1st year | ||||||||||||
| PRYGB | 122 | 0 | 0% | 25 | 20% | 97 | 80% | 8.98 |
1.13 (0.46, 2.78) |
(.795) | ||
| RRYGB | 32 | 0 | 0% | 7 | 22% | 25 | 78% | 8.96 | ||||
| 5th year | ||||||||||||
| PRYGB | 122 | 0 | 0% | 12 | 10% | 110 | 90% | 9.50 |
7.91 (1.83, 34.26) |
(.006) | ||
| RRYGB | 32 | 8 | 25% | 4 | 13% | 20 | 62% | 6.88 | ||||
| DM | ||||||||||||
| 1st year | ||||||||||||
| PRYGB | 93 | 0 | 0% | 32 | 35% | 61 | 65% | 8.27 |
0.64 (0.23, 1.78) |
(.392) | ||
| RRYGB | 21 | 0 | 0% | 5 | 24% | 16 | 76% | 8.82 | ||||
| 5th year | ||||||||||||
| PRYGB | 93 | 0 | 0% | 19 | 20% | 74 | 80% | 8.99 |
1.68 (0.41, 6.88) |
(.466) | ||
| RRYGB | 21 | 3 | 12% | 2 | 11% | 16 | 77% | 8.21 | ||||
Score of improvement estimated by partial credit score method; Adj. prop. OR: proportional odds ratio adjusted by age and sex using multiple ordinal regression estimated using generalized estimation equation and weighted by inverse propensity score weights, where the primary RYGB is the reference category; DM, diabetes mellitus; PRYGB, primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; RRYGB, revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass