Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 7;32(9):3023–3033. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06189-4

Table 5.

Comparison of the early and late impacts of PRYGB and RRYGB on main associated medical conditions

n = total No change Improved Resolved Scorea Adj. prop
ORb
(95% CI)
P
n % n % n %
Hypertension
  1st year
  PRYGB 157 0 0% 21 13% 136 87% 9.33

2.92

(1.09, 7.85)

(.033)
  RRYGB 48 0 0% 15 32% 33 68% 8.40
  5th year
  PRYGB 157 0 0% 16 10% 141 90% 9.50 2.90 (.099)
  RRYGB 48 4 8% 7 14% 37 76% 8.35 (0.82, 10.26)
Dyslipidemia
  1st year
  PRYGB 122 0 0% 25 20% 97 80% 8.98

1.13

(0.46, 2.78)

(.795)
  RRYGB 32 0 0% 7 22% 25 78% 8.96
  5th year
  PRYGB 122 0 0% 12 10% 110 90% 9.50

7.91

(1.83, 34.26)

(.006)
  RRYGB 32 8 25% 4 13% 20 62% 6.88
DM
  1st year
  PRYGB 93 0 0% 32 35% 61 65% 8.27

0.64

(0.23, 1.78)

(.392)
  RRYGB 21 0 0% 5 24% 16 76% 8.82
  5th year
  PRYGB 93 0 0% 19 20% 74 80% 8.99

1.68

(0.41, 6.88)

(.466)
  RRYGB 21 3 12% 2 11% 16 77% 8.21

a Score of improvement estimated by partial credit score method; Adj. prop. OR: proportional odds ratio adjusted by age and sex using multiple ordinal regression estimated using generalized estimation equation and weighted by inverse propensity score weights, where the primary RYGB is the reference category; DM, diabetes mellitus; PRYGB, primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; RRYGB, revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass