Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 20;12:14244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18671-1

Table 1.

Independent variables and response factors opted for optimization of IMQ-nTES.

Independent variables Levels analyzed
Low level (− 1) High level (+ 1)
X1: PL90G:EA conc. (mg) 75:25 95:5
X2: ethanol conc. (% v/v) 20 40
X3: stirring rate (rpm) 700 1200
Response factors (dependent) Desirable response
Y1: vesicle size (nm) Minimize
Y2: poly-dispersibility Minimize
Y3: entrapment efficiency (%) Maximize