Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 8;13:905651. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.905651

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Network meta-analysis for different PD-1 inhibitor combination treatments. (A) Hazard ratio (HR) [95% credible intervals (CI)] for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). (B) Relative risk (RR) (95% CI) for ORR and ≥3 TRAEs. (C) Hazard ratio (HR) [95% credible intervals (CI)] for overall survival (OS) of CPS ≥1. Data in each cell are HR or RR (95% CI) for the comparison of row-defining treatment versus column-defining treatment. HR less than 1 and RR for ORR more than 1 favored upper-row treatment. RR for ≥3 TRAEs more than 1 favored downer-row treatment. Significant results were highlighted in red and bold. Niv+L-OHP, nivolumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy; Sin+L-OHP, sintilimab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy; Pem+DDP, pembrolizumab plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy; L-OHP, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy; DDP, cisplatin-based chemotherapy.