Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 8;13:973605. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.973605

Table 3.

Comparison of the performance metrics of WGS-AST on Illumina and ONT assemblies, by antimicrobial.

Antimicrobial CA VME ME n
Illumina ONT Illumina ONT Illumina ONT
Amikacin 80% 83% 23% 20% 19% 16% 163
Aztreonam 91% 92% 9% 6% 12% 14% 180
Cefazolin 84% 84% 22% 20% 0% 6% 68
Cefepime 85% 83% 16% 21% 12% 7% 173
Cefotaxime 96% 95% 4% 4% 0% 10% 107
Ceftazidime 89% 93% 10% 5% 14% 14% 181
Ceftazidime-avibactam 97% 96% 6% 35% 3% 1% 175
Ceftriaxone 96% 96% 4% 2% 3% 7% 79
Ciprofloxacin 95% 88% 3% 12% 10% 12% 181
Doripenem 84% 83% 22% 22% 8% 11% 164
Ertapenem 94% 91% 7% 6% 4% 16% 181
Gentamicin 93% 88% 8% 8% 6% 15% 171
Imipenem 84% 79% 6% 5% 31% 44% 94
Imipenem-relebactam 97% 97% 21% 21% 1% 1% 91
Levofloxacin 90% 85% 9% 14% 11% 18% 181
Meropenem 84% 80% 3% 5% 31% 37% 90
Meropenem-vaborbactam 97% 95% 21% 36% 1% 1% 91
Piperacillin-tazobactam 90% 84% 11% 21% 7% 2% 168
Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim 80% 80% 11% 8% 30% 33% 167
Tetracycline 81% 82% 30% 30% 12% 10% 79
Ticarcillin-clavulanic acid 92% 95% 9% 5% 0% 0% 101
Tobramycin 94% 92% 4% 6% 7% 10% 173

CA: Categorical agreement, VME: Very major error, ME: Major error, n: number of evaluated species-antimicrobial pairs.